[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161201094200.GK1867@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 09:42:00 +0000
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@...il.com>
CC: Brian Austin <brian.austin@...rus.com>,
Paul Handrigan <Paul.Handrigan@...rus.com>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@...g-vd.ch>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: cs42l56: Fix misuse of
regmap_update_bits
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 06:10:49PM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> Using regmap_update_bits(..., mask, 1) with 'mask' following (1 << k)
> and k greater than 0 is wrong. Indeed, _regmap_update_bits will perform
> (mask & 1), which results in 0 if LSB of mask is 0. Thus the call
> regmap_update_bits(..., mask, 1) is in reality equivalent to
> regmap_update_bits(..., mask, 0).
>
> In such a case, the correct use is regmap_update_bits(..., mask, mask).
>
> This driver is performing such a mistake with the CS42L56_AIN*_REF_MASK
> masks, which equal 0x10, 0x20, 0x40 and 0x80. Fix the driver to make it
> consistent with the API. Please note that this change is untested,
> as I do not have this piece of hardware. Testers are welcome!
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@...g-vd.ch>
> ---
Looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Thanks,
Charles
Powered by blists - more mailing lists