[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161201113031.GB5813@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 11:30:32 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Cc: Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [bug report v4.8] fs/locks.c: kernel oops during posix lock
stress test
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:10:14AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> When I run stress-ng via the following steps on one ARM64 dual
> socket system(Cavium Thunder), the kernel oops[1] can often be
> triggered after running the stress test for several hours(sometimes
> it may take longer):
>
> - git clone git://kernel.ubuntu.com/cking/stress-ng.git
> - apply the attachment patch which just makes the posix file
> lock stress test more aggressive
> - run the test via '~/git/stress-ng$./stress-ng --lockf 128 --aggressive'
>
>
> From the oops log, looks one garbage file_lock node is got
> from the linked list of 'ctx->flc_posix' when the issue happens.
>
> BTW, the issue isn't observed on single socket Cavium Thunder yet,
> and the same issue can be seen on Ubuntu Xenial(v4.4 based kernel)
> too.
FWIW, I've been running this on Seattle for 24 hours with your patch applied
and not seen any problems yet. That said, Thomas did just fix an rt_mutex
race which only seemed to pop up on Thunder, so you could give those
patches a try.
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161130205431.629977871@linutronix.de
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists