linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Flush old iotlb for kdump when the device gets context mapped

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <58400D00.6070708@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2016 19:44:00 +0800
From:   Xunlei Pang <xpang@...hat.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, xlpang@...hat.com
Cc:     Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Don Brace <don.brace@...rosemi.com>,
        Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>,
        kexec@...ts.infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...il.com>,
        Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Flush old iotlb for kdump when the device
 gets context mapped

On 12/01/2016 at 06:33 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 10:15:45AM +0800, Xunlei Pang wrote:
>> index 3965e73..624eac9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> @@ -2024,6 +2024,25 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct dmar_domain *domain,
>>         if (context_present(context))
>>                 goto out_unlock;
>>  
>> +       /*
>> +        * For kdump cases, old valid entries may be cached due to the
>> +        * in-flight DMA and copied pgtable, but there is no unmapping
>> +        * behaviour for them, thus we need an explicit cache flush for
>> +        * the newly-mapped device. For kdump, at this point, the device
>> +        * is supposed to finish reset at its driver probe stage, so no
>> +        * in-flight DMA will exist, and we don't need to worry anymore
>> +        * hereafter.
>> +        */
>> +       if (context_copied(context)) {
>> +               u16 did_old = context_domain_id(context);
>> +
>> +               if (did_old >= 0 && did_old < cap_ndoms(iommu->cap))
>> +                       iommu->flush.flush_context(iommu, did_old,
>> +                                                  (((u16)bus) << 8) | devfn,
>> +                                                  DMA_CCMD_MASK_NOBIT,
>> +                                                  DMA_CCMD_DEVICE_INVL);
>> +       }
>> +
>>         pgd = domain->pgd;
> Yes, this looks better. Have you tested it the same way as the old
> patch?

Yes, I have tested and it works, will send v3 later.

Regards,
Xunlei