linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 29/39] Annotate hardware config module parameters in drivers/staging/media/

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161201131758.348be20a@vento.lan>
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2016 13:17:58 -0200
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
To:     David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
        gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, minyard@....org,
        linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 29/39] Annotate hardware config module parameters in
 drivers/staging/media/

Em Thu, 01 Dec 2016 14:59:56 +0000
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> escreveu:

> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com> wrote:
> 
> > drivers/staging/media/lirc/lirc_parallel.c:728:19: error: Expected ) in function declarator  
> 
> Did you apply patch 1 first?  That defines module_param_hw*.

No. Applying it at the media upstream tree can be risky if it ends
by being merged with some changes.

On what tree do you intend patch 1 to be merged?

> 
> David



Thanks,
Mauro