[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20161201152517.27698-1-mhocko@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:25:15 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] GFP_NOFAIL cleanups
Hi,
I have posted this as an RFC previously [1] as there was no fundamental
disagreement I would like to ask for inclusion.
Tetsuo has noticed [2] that recent changes have changed GFP_NOFAIL
semantic for costly order requests. I believe that the primary reason
why this happened is that our GFP_NOFAIL checks are too scattered
and it is really easy to forget about adding one. That's why I am
proposing patch 1 which consolidates all the nofail handling at a single
place. This should help to make this code better maintainable.
Patch 2 on top is a further attempt to make GFP_NOFAIL semantic less
surprising. As things stand currently GFP_NOFAIL overrides the oom killer
prevention code which is both subtle and not really needed. The patch 2
has more details about issues this might cause.
I would consider both patches more a cleanup than anything else. Any
feedback is highly appreciated.
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161123064925.9716-1-mhocko@kernel.org
[2] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1479387004-5998-1-git-send-email-penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
Powered by blists - more mailing lists