linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] firmware: remove warning at documentation generation time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161201161154.GX1402@wotan.suse.de>
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:11:54 +0100
From:   "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Silvio Fricke <silvio.fricke@...il.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>,
        "Luis R . Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] firmware: remove warning at documentation
 generation time

On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 06:50:32PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Fri, 25 Nov 2016 15:59:47 +0100
> Silvio Fricke <silvio.fricke@...il.com> escreveu:
> 
> > This patch removes following error at for `make htmldocs`. No functional
> > change.
> > 
> > 	./drivers/base/firmware_class.c:1348: WARNING: Bullet list ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Silvio Fricke <silvio.fricke@...il.com>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>

Acked-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@...nel.org>

Jonathan,

firmware_class changes have been lately going through Greg's tree, he has a few
more pending changes on his driver-core-next branch for firmware_class but this
patch not create a conflict. It can go in first or later as such its
technically fine for it to go either through your tree or Greg's tree.

I'll let Greg decide. I've bounced him a copy of the patch.

  Luis