linux-kernel - Re: perf: fuzzer BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __unwind

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161201164107.GN3092@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2016 17:41:07 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        "dvyukov@...gle.com" <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: perf: fuzzer BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __unwind_start

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:33:16AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 06:52:35AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 01:13:03PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > This question was probably intended for other folks, but I should point
> > > out that idle tasks *do* invoke the scheduler.  cpu_idle_loop() calls
> > > schedule_preempt_disabled().
> > 
> > Right, but that doesn't matter I think. The below will simply not call
> > rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch() from the idle task, which would be
> > fine I think.
> > 
> > > > So is the following a sensible approach, or should I look elsewhere?
> > > > 
> > > > 	#define cond_resched_rcu_qs() \
> > > > 	do { \
> > > > 		if (!is_idle_task(current) && !cond_resched()) \
> > > > 			rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current); \
> > 
> > You should reverse your conditions though:
> > 
> > 		if (!cond_resched() && !is_idle_task(current))
> > 			rcu_note_voluntary_context_switch(current);
> > 
> > That way we'll still do cond_resched() and you only gate the RCU call.
> 
> This makes it illegal at early boot.

Humm, how early are we talking?