linux-kernel - Re: [patch 0/4] rtmutex: Plug unlock vs. requeue race

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161201183329.GQ3045@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2016 19:33:29 +0100
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sebastian Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [patch 0/4] rtmutex: Plug unlock vs. requeue race

On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 09:04:40PM -0000, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The following series plugs a subtle race and robustifies the code
> further. Aside of that it adds commentry about lockless operations and
> removes a confusing extra define.

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>