lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2016 12:35:01 -0700
From:   Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To:     Bamvor Zhang Jian <bamvor.zhangjian@...aro.org>
Cc:     "Zhang Jian(Bamvor)" <bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        linux-api <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] enable O and KBUILD_OUTPUT for kselftest

On 11/30/2016 08:32 AM, Bamvor Zhang Jian wrote:
> Hi, Shuah, Michael
> 
> On 30 November 2016 at 22:17, Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com> wrote:
>> On 11/29/2016 04:55 AM, bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com wrote:
>>> From: Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamvor.zhangjian@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> Here is my second version for enabling the KBUILD_OUTPUT for kselftest.
>>> The first version could be found here[1]. I fix and test all the TARGET
>>> in tools/testing/selftest/Makefile. For ppc, I test through fake target.
>>>
>>> There are six patches in these series. And five of them clean up the
>>> existing code. I split the clean up patches into five, hope it is easy
>>> to review.
>>>
>>>   selftests: remove duplicated all and clean target
>>>   selftests: remove useless TEST_DIRS
>>> a selftests: add pattern rules
>>> A selftests: remove CROSS_COMPILE in dedicated Makefile
>>> A selftests: add EXTRA_CLEAN for clean target
>>>   selftests: enable O and KBUILD_OUTPUT
>>>
>>> Notes:
>>>   A: Ack by Michael.
>>>   a: ack by Michael. Minor update after rebase.
>>
>> Bamovar/Michael,
>>
>> Are these rebased to linux-next? Michael was concerned about
>> conflicts with powerpc tree. Would rebasing to linux-next help
>> avoiding conflicts?
> Yes. I rebase to latest linux-next. It is taged as 1128 when I rebase
> them yesterday. I fix some conflict when rebase.
> 

Hi Bemovar,

These patches don't apply to linux-kselftest next and I can't apply
them now. Looks like there are new tests that came through a netdev
tree already in linux-next. It does happen when a new feature goes
into a tree with the test.

So for now we will have to wait on these and when 4.10-rc1 comes out,
please rebase it on linux-kselftest latest. I will try to get these
into 4.10-rc1 fixes

thanks,
-- Shuah

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ