linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI / APEI: Fix NMI notification handling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161201224717.4tkp5glpib5fhusv@pd.tnic>
Date:   Thu, 1 Dec 2016 23:47:17 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...nel.org>,
        Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        Tyler Baicar <tbaicar@...eaurora.org>,
        Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>,
        Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
        Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ACPI / APEI: Fix NMI notification handling

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:29:45PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Well, there's another ARM-related patch touching APEI.
> 
> I guess whoever takes this one should also take the other one and
> honestly they can go in via any tree as far as I'm concerned, I'm just trying to
> avoid merge clashes here. :-)

Maybe have ARM-folk ACK the other one and take both through your ACPI
tree? They both do have ACPI in common :-)

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.