[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK7LNAS8RFs6iLNObj=HESUqWyEr8CO7B=LCCCbZ6Ki8Em96wg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:33:58 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/39] mtd: nand: denali: fix erased page check code
Hi Boris,
2016-11-28 0:21 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>:
> On Sun, 27 Nov 2016 03:05:55 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com> wrote:
>
>> Currently, is_erased() is called against "buf" twice, so the second
>> call is meaningless. The second one should be checked against
>> chip->oob_poi.
>>
>
> IMO, patch 9 to 12 should be squashed in a single patch. All you're
> doing in these patch is fixing the check_erased_page logic.
>
> You can describe the different broken thing in the commit message, but
> splitting things as you do does not help much.
OK. I will do so.
I realized some mistakes in this part
(both in my patches and in the current mainline code),
so I will rework it in a more sensible chunk.
> Also, please have at nand_check_erased_ecc_chunk() [1] instead of using
> a private method (is_erased()) to check if the page is erased.
> With this method you get bitflips in erased pages correction for free.
I will use this helper, thanks!
With this, I think I answered all of your questions to v1.
(Please tell me if there is something I missed to answer.)
Thanks a lot for your review.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists