[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87polark7z.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 07:08:48 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Sara Sharon <sara.sharon@...el.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Rajkumar Manoharan <rmanohar@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree with the net-next tree
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> writes:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the wireless-drivers-next tree got a
> conflict in:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c
>
> between commit:
>
> f3fe4e93dd63 ("mac80211: add a HW flag for supporting HW TX fragmentation")
>
> from the net-next tree and commit:
>
> ff32eeb86aa1 ("ath10k: advertize hardware packet loss mechanism")
>
> from the wireless-drivers-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
The fix looks good, thanks. I sent a pull request to Dave yesteday which
should fix this.
--
Kalle Valo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists