[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161202092840.i67lhgglzlnugwpd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:28:40 +0100
From: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@...il.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, david@...ma-star.at, tytso@....edu,
dedekind1@...il.com, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] ubifs: Maintain a parent pointer
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:02:19PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>
> + if (new_dir != old_dir) {
> + fst_inode_ui->parent_inum = new_dir->i_ino;
> + snd_inode_ui->parent_inum = old_dir->i_ino;
> + }
> +
> if (old_dir != new_dir) {
> if (S_ISDIR(fst_inode->i_mode) && !S_ISDIR(snd_inode->i_mode)) {
> inc_nlink(new_dir);
Insignificant thing, but use the existing if-statment instead?
Cheers,
Marcus Folkesson
Powered by blists - more mailing lists