[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161202093734.GE6830@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 10:37:35 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Boris Zhmurov <bb@...nelpanic.ru>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>,
Donald Buczek <buczek@...gen.mpg.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks with `kswapd` and
`mem_cgroup_shrink_node`
On Thu 01-12-16 21:10:01, Boris Zhmurov wrote:
> Michal Hocko 30/11/16 21:25:
>
> >>> Do I get it right that s@...d_resched_rcu_qs@...d_resched@ didn't help?
> >>
> >> I didn't try that. I've tried 4 patches from Paul's linux-rcu tree.
> >> I can try another portion of patches, no problem :)
> >
> > Replacing cond_resched_rcu_qs in shrink_node_memcg by cond_resched would
> > be really helpful to tell whether we are missing a real scheduling point
> > or whether something more serious is going on here.
>
> Well, I can confirm, that replacing cond_resched_rcu_qs in
> shrink_node_memcg by cond_resched also makes dmesg clean from RCU CPU
> stall warnings.
>
> I've attached patch (just modification of Paul's patch), that fixes RCU
> stall messages in situations, when all memory is used by
> couchbase/memcached + fs cache and linux starts to use swap.
OK, thanks for the confirmation! I will send a patch because it is true
that we do not have any scheduling point if no pages can be isolated
fromm the LRU. This might be what you are seeing.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists