linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ia64: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3a707749-4737-1dd3-fce2-c1968762de38@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 2 Dec 2016 17:55:32 +0800
From:   Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ia64: move cacheinfo sysfs to generic cacheinfo
 infrastructure

On 2016/12/1 23:08, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> This patch removes the redundant sysfs cacheinfo code by reusing
> the recently introduced generic cacheinfo infrastructure through the
> commit 246246cbde5e ("drivers: base: support cpu cache information
> interface to userspace via sysfs")
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
> Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
> Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
> Cc: linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
> ---
>  arch/ia64/kernel/topology.c | 384 ++++++++++++++------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 117 insertions(+), 267 deletions(-)
>
> v1->v2:
> 	- Rebased on top -next that has a patch introducing
> 	  cpu_map_populated
> 	- Also added SMP related macros that I missed in v1
> Hi,
>
> This is repost of the patch that was posted before several times to
> remove duplicate code. Since I don't have the platform to test, I was
> hoping to get some testing. This time Hanjun has kindly agreed to do
> some testing. Thanks a lot Hanjun in advance. You need to base this on
> top linux-next as there are few patches there. Take your time as this is
> not urgent at all.

You are welcome, I will test it next week :)

Thanks
Hanjun