[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1480675876-19540-4-git-send-email-peda@axentia.se>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 11:51:16 +0100
From: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: sx150x: handle missing 'advanced' reg in sx1504 and sx1505
This fixes a problem where sx150x_regmap_reg_width() returns 8 for the
data register (reg 0) for sx1504 where it should return 4, and return
a correct 8 for sx1505 but for the wrong reason (both chips lack the
'advanced' register). This is not a real problem, since nothing depends
on the function returning 4 or 8, and certainly not if it is returning
8 for the wrong reason. But fix this to avoid nasty surprises down the
line.
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c
index 37b8737e61a9..bdb7ea3d9911 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-sx150x.c
@@ -967,6 +967,7 @@ static int sx150x_regmap_reg_width(struct sx150x_pinctrl *pctl,
reg == data->pri.x123.reg_advanced)
||
(data->model == SX150X_456 &&
+ data->pri.x456.reg_advanced &&
reg == data->pri.x456.reg_advanced)) {
return 8;
} else {
--
2.1.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists