[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49974235.a4bETaqHmt@wuerfel>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 15:51:22 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adam Borowski <kilobyte@...band.pl>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
Debian kernel maintainers <debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Modra <amodra@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH, v3.9] default exported asm symbols to zero
On Friday, December 2, 2016 1:59:15 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > With binutils-2.16 and before, a weak missing symbol was kept during the
>
> 2.26?
>
> > final link, and a missing CRC for an export would lead to that CRC
> > being treated as zero implicitly. With binutils-2.17, the crc
>
> 2.27?'
Yes, serious version number deficiency on my end. Also 4.9 instead of 3.9
in the subject...
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists