[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161202004214.GA112550@google.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:42:15 -0800
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] HID: i2c-hid: support regulator power on/off
Hi Dmitry,
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:37:37PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 04:31:10PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On some boards, we need to enable a regulator before using the HID, and
> > it's also nice to save power in suspend by disabling it. Support an
> > optional "vdd-supply" and a companion initialization delay.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang <wxt@...k-chips.com>
> > Cc: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
> > Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org
> > ---
> > v2:
> > * support compatible property for wacom, with specific "vdd-supply" name
> > * support the 100ms delay needed for this digitizer
> > * target regulator support only at specific device
> >
> > v3:
> > * drop Wacom specifics and allow this to be used generically
> > * add "init-delay-ms" property support
> >
> > drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/linux/i2c/i2c-hid.h | 6 ++++++
> > 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> > index b3ec4f2de875..4cb523133d13 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
> > @@ -37,7 +37,9 @@
> > #include <linux/mutex.h>
> > #include <linux/acpi.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> > +#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >
> > #include <linux/i2c/i2c-hid.h>
> >
> > @@ -937,6 +939,22 @@ static int i2c_hid_of_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > }
> > pdata->hid_descriptor_address = val;
> >
> > + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev->of_node, "init-delay-ms", &val);
> > + if (!ret)
> > + pdata->init_delay_ms = ret;
> > +
> > + pdata->supply = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vdd");
>
> Make it devm_regulator_get(), it's cleaner (you'll get a dummy regulator
> that you can enable/disbale and not check if it is null or not).
>
> pdata->supply = devm_regulator_get_optional(dev, "vdd");
> if (IS_ERR(pdata->supply)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(pdata->supply);
> if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> dev_err(...);
> return ret;
> }
I had it as devm_regulator_get() in v1, but at that time, I was faking
the firmware init delay using a regulator property. Now that I want to
delay in this driver after enabling the regulator, I'd like to know the
difference between a dummy and a real regulator. There's no need to wait
after messing with the dummy regulator.
Brian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists