[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9B306A9D-C57C-4252-979B-C22B2F3AA9FB@sigma-star.at>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 16:50:41 +0100
From: David Gstir <david@...ma-star.at>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
tytso@....edu, dedekind1@...il.com, mhalcrow@...gle.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hch@...radead.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
jaegeuk@...nel.org, dengler@...utronix.de, sbabic@...x.de,
wd@...x.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] fscrypt: Cleanup fscrypt_{decrypt,encrypt}_page()
> On 02.12.2016, at 09:19, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 11:14:55PM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
>> + * @lblk_num: Logical block number. This must be unique for multiple
>> + * calls with same page.
>
> Must be unique for all calls with the same *inode*, except when overwriting
> previously written data.
Yes, of course! Will fix that.
Thanks,
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists