linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] arm64: memory-hotplug: Add Memory Hotplug support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <546cf066-6351-8357-2388-73420ec063ec@broadcom.com>
Date:   Fri, 2 Dec 2016 09:40:04 -0800
From:   Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
To:     Maciej Bielski <m.bielski@...tualopensystems.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>,
        BCM Kernel Feedback <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
        Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrea Reale2 <REALEAN2@...ibm.com>,
        Kostas Katrinis <katrinisk@...ibm.com>,
        Christian Pinto <c.pinto@...tualopensystems.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] arm64: memory-hotplug: Add Memory Hotplug support

Hi Maciej,

On 16-12-02 02:55 AM, Maciej Bielski wrote:
>
>
> On 02/12/2016 11:49, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:13:43AM +0100, Maciej Bielski wrote:
>>> Recently we have announced our effort on that:
>>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/17/49
>>>
>>> For now we have a working solution for hotplug and we are performing
>>> code cleanup to push the patches soon.
>> Are these intended to replace or extend Scott's patches? If the former,
>> please work with Scott's stuff as a base rather than posting a competing
>> series.
> In the piece of code provided by Scott I have seen similar steps to what
> is done by us but our work went further since we have the mapping
> created and everything is working via the sysfs interface. I am now
> having closer look and comparing them.

I would love to see the missing section mapping step and any other 
additions to test out.  Please send additions as soon as you have a chance.

Regards,
  Scott

>>
>> Will
>