[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1480713561-6617-5-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 16:19:12 -0500
From: kan.liang@...el.com
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
namhyung@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
wangnan0@...wei.com, mark.rutland@....com, andi@...stfloor.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH V2 04/13] perf/core: output multiplexing overhead
From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Multiplexing overhead is one of the key overhead when the number of
events is more than available counters.
The multiplexing overhead PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD is a common overhead
type.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
---
include/linux/perf_event.h | 2 ++
include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 1 +
kernel/events/core.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/perf_event.h b/include/linux/perf_event.h
index ebd356e..351d321 100644
--- a/include/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -794,6 +794,8 @@ struct perf_cpu_context {
struct list_head sched_cb_entry;
int sched_cb_usage;
+
+ struct perf_overhead_entry mux_overhead;
};
struct perf_output_handle {
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
index fe7b1fb..355086f 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -999,6 +999,7 @@ struct perf_branch_entry {
*/
enum perf_record_overhead_type {
PERF_CORE_OVERHEAD = 0,
+ PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD = 0,
PERF_PMU_OVERHEAD = 20,
PERF_PMU_SAMPLE_OVERHEAD = 20,
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 306bc92..025a19d 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -1830,6 +1830,9 @@ event_sched_out(struct perf_event *event,
if (event->attr.exclusive || !cpuctx->active_oncpu)
cpuctx->exclusive = 0;
+ if (log_overhead && cpuctx->mux_overhead.nr)
+ perf_log_overhead(event, PERF_CORE_MUX_OVERHEAD, &cpuctx->mux_overhead);
+
perf_pmu_enable(event->pmu);
}
@@ -3330,9 +3333,17 @@ static void rotate_ctx(struct perf_event_context *ctx)
list_rotate_left(&ctx->flexible_groups);
}
+static void
+perf_calculate_mux_overhead(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx, u64 time)
+{
+ cpuctx->mux_overhead.nr++;
+ cpuctx->mux_overhead.time += time;
+}
+
static int perf_rotate_context(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
{
struct perf_event_context *ctx = NULL;
+ u64 start_clock, end_clock;
int rotate = 0;
if (cpuctx->ctx.nr_events) {
@@ -3349,6 +3360,7 @@ static int perf_rotate_context(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
if (!rotate)
goto done;
+ start_clock = perf_clock();
perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
perf_pmu_disable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
@@ -3364,6 +3376,8 @@ static int perf_rotate_context(struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx)
perf_pmu_enable(cpuctx->ctx.pmu);
perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
+ end_clock = perf_clock();
+ perf_calculate_mux_overhead(cpuctx, end_clock - start_clock);
done:
return rotate;
--
2.5.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists