[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f214a441-9e4b-6c40-f09d-32a6d1ea4dd0@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 16:17:51 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>,
Dmitry Tarnyagin <dmitry.tarnyagin@...kless.no>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net: caif: fix ineffective error check
Hello.
On 12/3/2016 2:18 PM, Pan Bian wrote:
> In function caif_sktinit_module(), the check of the return value of
> sock_register() seems ineffective. This patch fixes it.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188751
>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
> ---
> net/caif/caif_socket.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/caif/caif_socket.c b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
> index aa209b1..2a689a3 100644
> --- a/net/caif/caif_socket.c
> +++ b/net/caif/caif_socket.c
> @@ -1108,7 +1108,7 @@ static int caif_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock, int protocol,
> static int __init caif_sktinit_module(void)
> {
> int err = sock_register(&caif_family_ops);
> - if (!err)
> + if (err)
> return err;
Why not just:
return sock_register(&caif_family_ops);
> return 0;
> }
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists