[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1480726409-20350-14-git-send-email-jsimmons@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2016 19:53:20 -0500
From: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lustre Development List <lustre-devel@...ts.lustre.org>,
Fan Yong <fan.yong@...el.com>, Li Xi <lixi@....com>,
James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 13/22] staging: lustre: statahead: set sai_index_wait with lli_sa_lock held
From: Fan Yong <fan.yong@...el.com>
It is the sponsor thread of the statahead thread to update the
sai::sai_index_wait. Originally, it didn't hold the lli_sa_lock
when did that. Becuase of out-of-order execution others may miss
to wakeup such thread.
On the other hand, if the statahead RPC gets failure, it should
wakeup the sponsor thread, not the statahead thread.
Signed-off-by: Li Xi <lixi@....com>
Signed-off-by: Fan Yong <fan.yong@...el.com>
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-7828
Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/18499
Reviewed-by: Lai Siyao <lai.siyao@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@...radead.org>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/statahead.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/statahead.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/statahead.c
index b43955f..4769a22 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/statahead.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/statahead.c
@@ -659,8 +659,8 @@ static int ll_statahead_interpret(struct ptlrpc_request *req,
struct ll_inode_info *lli = ll_i2info(dir);
struct ll_statahead_info *sai = lli->lli_sai;
struct sa_entry *entry = (struct sa_entry *)minfo->mi_cbdata;
+ wait_queue_head_t *waitq = NULL;
__u64 handle = 0;
- bool wakeup;
if (it_disposition(it, DISP_LOOKUP_NEG))
rc = -ENOENT;
@@ -693,7 +693,8 @@ static int ll_statahead_interpret(struct ptlrpc_request *req,
spin_lock(&lli->lli_sa_lock);
if (rc) {
- wakeup = __sa_make_ready(sai, entry, rc);
+ if (__sa_make_ready(sai, entry, rc))
+ waitq = &sai->sai_waitq;
} else {
entry->se_minfo = minfo;
entry->se_req = ptlrpc_request_addref(req);
@@ -704,13 +705,15 @@ static int ll_statahead_interpret(struct ptlrpc_request *req,
* with parent's lock held, for example: unlink.
*/
entry->se_handle = handle;
- wakeup = !sa_has_callback(sai);
+ if (!sa_has_callback(sai))
+ waitq = &sai->sai_thread.t_ctl_waitq;
+
list_add_tail(&entry->se_list, &sai->sai_interim_entries);
}
sai->sai_replied++;
- if (wakeup)
- wake_up(&sai->sai_thread.t_ctl_waitq);
+ if (waitq)
+ wake_up(waitq);
spin_unlock(&lli->lli_sa_lock);
return rc;
@@ -1397,10 +1400,10 @@ static int revalidate_statahead_dentry(struct inode *dir,
struct dentry **dentryp,
bool unplug)
{
+ struct ll_inode_info *lli = ll_i2info(dir);
struct sa_entry *entry = NULL;
struct l_wait_info lwi = { 0 };
struct ll_dentry_data *ldd;
- struct ll_inode_info *lli;
int rc = 0;
if ((*dentryp)->d_name.name[0] == '.') {
@@ -1446,7 +1449,9 @@ static int revalidate_statahead_dentry(struct inode *dir,
sa_handle_callback(sai);
if (!sa_ready(entry)) {
+ spin_lock(&lli->lli_sa_lock);
sai->sai_index_wait = entry->se_index;
+ spin_unlock(&lli->lli_sa_lock);
lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTR(cfs_time_seconds(30), NULL,
LWI_ON_SIGNAL_NOOP, NULL);
rc = l_wait_event(sai->sai_waitq, sa_ready(entry), &lwi);
@@ -1514,7 +1519,6 @@ static int revalidate_statahead_dentry(struct inode *dir,
* dentry_may_statahead().
*/
ldd = ll_d2d(*dentryp);
- lli = ll_i2info(dir);
/* ldd can be NULL if llite lookup failed. */
if (ldd)
ldd->lld_sa_generation = lli->lli_sa_generation;
--
1.7.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists