[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161204160504.GG1555@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 16:05:04 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] statx: Add a system call to make enhanced file info
available [ver #3]
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 04:38:05AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> I understand wanting to avoid extra arguments, but you are asking for trouble
> with that sort of calling conventions. Verifying that all call chains have
> these fields initialized is bloody unpleasant and it *is* going to break,
> especially since the rules are "you need to initialize it for vfs_xgetattr(),
> but not for vfs_getattr()" - the names are similar enough for confusion,
> and that's not the only such pair.
BTW, after some grepping: you seem to leave ecryptfs_getattr() as-is, which
means that flags it had been passed by caller in *stat are not seen by
underlying fs. Looks fishy...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists