[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161204195707.GA21783@vader>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 11:57:07 -0800
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>
To: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: fix improper return value
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 12:51:53PM +0800, Pan Bian wrote:
> In function btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate(), errno is assigned to variable ret
> on errors. However, it directly returns 0. It may be better to return
> ret. This patch also removes the warning, because the caller already
> prints a warning.
>
> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188731
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c b/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c
> index 7fc89e4..83bb2f2 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c
> @@ -351,7 +351,5 @@ int btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
>
> out:
> btrfs_free_path(path);
> - if (ret)
> - btrfs_warn(fs_info, "btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate failed %d", ret);
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists