[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161205170848.6952c08f@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 17:08:48 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with Linus'
tree
Hi Michal,
On Mon, 5 Dec 2016 06:56:56 +0100 Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> FWIW this resolution is correct
Thanks, good to know.
> > but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
>
> Sorry about that, I haven't noticed the conflict.
No worries, that is what I am here for :-)
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Powered by blists - more mailing lists