[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1480921774.2583.351.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 09:09:34 +0200
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
Pan Bian <bianpan201604@....com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Pan Bian <bianpan2016@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mtd: ubi: fix improper return value
On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 21:52 +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> We should better think about how to get ubi_self_check_all_ff()
> fixed.
> When enabled on a modern NAND, vmalloc() is likely to fail now and
> then
> since len is the erase block size and can be up to a few mega bytes.
I did an attempt to switch from virtually continuous buffers to an
array of page pointers, but never finished.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists