[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <584523E4.9030600@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:23:00 +0800
From: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>
CC: Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] mm: use ACCESS_ONCE in page_cpupid_xchg_last()
By reading the code, I find the following code maybe optimized by
compiler, maybe page->flags and old_flags use the same register,
so use ACCESS_ONCE in page_cpupid_xchg_last() to fix the problem.
Signed-off-by: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
---
mm/mmzone.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/mm/mmzone.c b/mm/mmzone.c
index 5652be8..e0b698e 100644
--- a/mm/mmzone.c
+++ b/mm/mmzone.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ int page_cpupid_xchg_last(struct page *page, int cpupid)
int last_cpupid;
do {
- old_flags = flags = page->flags;
+ old_flags = flags = ACCESS_ONCE(page->flags);
last_cpupid = page_cpupid_last(page);
flags &= ~(LAST_CPUPID_MASK << LAST_CPUPID_PGSHIFT);
--
1.8.3.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists