linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ARM: da850: fix infinite loop in clk_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <689efaa1-d8d9-6937-5880-3ed7a1401268@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2016 15:45:51 +0530
From:   Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...el.com>
CC:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        arm-soc <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ARM: da850: fix infinite loop in clk_set_rate()

On Monday 05 December 2016 03:39 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> The aemif clock is added twice to the lookup table in da850.c. This
> breaks the children list of pll0_sysclk3 as we're using the same list
> links in struct clk. When calling clk_set_rate(), we get stuck in
> propagate_rate().
> 
> Create a separate clock for nand, inheriting the rate of the aemif
> clock and retrieve it in the davinci_nand module.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 7 ++++++-
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
> index e770c97..c008e5e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c
> @@ -367,6 +367,11 @@ static struct clk aemif_clk = {
>  	.flags		= ALWAYS_ENABLED,
>  };
>  
> +static struct clk aemif_nand_clk = {
> +	.name		= "nand",
> +	.parent		= &aemif_clk,
> +};
> +
>  static struct clk usb11_clk = {
>  	.name		= "usb11",
>  	.parent		= &pll0_sysclk4,
> @@ -537,7 +542,7 @@ static struct clk_lookup da850_clks[] = {
>  	CLK("da830-mmc.0",	NULL,		&mmcsd0_clk),
>  	CLK("da830-mmc.1",	NULL,		&mmcsd1_clk),
>  	CLK("ti-aemif",		NULL,		&aemif_clk),
> -	CLK(NULL,		"aemif",	&aemif_clk),
> +	CLK(NULL,		"aemif",	&aemif_nand_clk),

Why use a NULL device name here? Same question was asked on v2
submission. Also, can you please make sure you are testing this in both
DT mode (da850-lcdk) and non-DT boot (da850-evm).

Thanks,
Sekhar