linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] crypto: mediatek

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b0df417-825f-65c6-4c02-85fe1c20ce50@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2016 11:18:06 +0100
From:   Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
To:     Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
        Roy Luo <cheng-hao.luo@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] crypto: mediatek - add DT bindings documentation



On 05/12/16 08:01, Ryder Lee wrote:
> Add DT bindings documentation for the crypto driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/crypto/mediatek-crypto.txt | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/mediatek-crypto.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/mediatek-crypto.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/mediatek-crypto.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..8b1db08
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/mediatek-crypto.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
> +MediaTek cryptographic accelerators
> +
> +Required properties:
> +- compatible: Should be "mediatek,mt7623-crypto"

Do you know how big the difference is between the crypto engine for 
mt7623/mt2701/mt8521p in comparison, let's say mt8173 or mt6797?
Do this SoCs have a crypot engine? If so and they are quite similar, we 
might think of adding a mtk-crypto binding and add soc specific bindings.

Regards,
Matthias

> +- reg: Address and length of the register set for the device
> +- interrupts: Should contain the five crypto engines interrupts in numeric
> +	order. These are global system and four descriptor rings.
> +- clocks: the clock used by the core
> +- clock-names: the names of the clock listed in the clocks property. These are
> +	"ethif", "cryp"
> +- power-domains: Must contain a reference to the PM domain.
> +
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +- interrupt-parent: Should be the phandle for the interrupt controller
> +  that services interrupts for this device
> +
> +
> +Example:
> +	crypto: crypto@...40000 {
> +		compatible = "mediatek,mt7623-crypto";
> +		reg = <0 0x1b240000 0 0x20000>;
> +		interrupts = <GIC_SPI 82 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> +			     <GIC_SPI 83 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> +			     <GIC_SPI 84 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> +			     <GIC_SPI 91 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>,
> +			     <GIC_SPI 97 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
> +		clocks = <&topckgen CLK_TOP_ETHIF_SEL>,
> +			 <&ethsys CLK_ETHSYS_CRYPTO>;
> +		clock-names = "ethif","cryp";
> +		power-domains = <&scpsys MT2701_POWER_DOMAIN_ETH>;
> +	};
>