[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161205110016.GA29776@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 12:00:17 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
jan.kratochvil@...hat.com, palves@...hat.com,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
syzkaller <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unkillable processes due to PTRACE_TRACEME again
On 12/05, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> On 12/02, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >
> > I am not on 2caceb3294a78c389b462e7e236a4e744a53a474 (Dec 1). And see
> > the same unwaitable zombie processes.
>
> This is another thing, and notabug. This is how ptrace works,
>
> > void *thr(void *arg)
> > {
> > ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, 0, 0, 0);
> > }
> >
> > int main()
> > {
> > int pid = fork();
> > if (pid == 0) {
> > pthread_t th;
> > pthread_create(&th, 0, thr, 0);
> > usleep(100000);
> > exit(0);
> > }
> > usleep(200000);
> > kill(pid, SIGKILL);
> > int status = 0;
> > waitpid(pid, &status, __WALL);
>
> waitpid(pid) hangs because you need to reap the sub-thread first.
I'm afraid I wasn't clear...
So the child process has 2 threads, the leader thread L and the sub-thread T.
waitpid(pid == L->pid) will block until all the threads go away, but since T is
traced it won't autoreap, the tracer should do waitpid(T->pid) first to reap
this zombie. waitpid(-1) should work too.
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists