linux-kernel - Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161205120136.GC16126@amd>
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2016 13:01:36 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
Cc:     alexandre.torgue@...com, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: stmmac ethernet in kernel 4.9-rc6: coalescing related pauses.

Hi!

> >>We had experimented this tuning on STB IP where just datagrams
> >>had to send externally. To be honest, although we had seen
> >>better results w/o any timer, we kept this approach enabled
> >>because the timer was fast enough to cover our tests on SH4 boxes.
> >
> >Please reply to David, and explain how it is supposed to
> >work... because right now it does not. 40 msec delays are not
> >acceptable in default configuration.
> 
> I mean, that on UP and SMP system this schema helped
> to improve the performance saving CPU on my side and this has been
> tested since a long time (~4 years).
> I tested something similar to yours where unidirectional traffic
> with limited throughput was needed and I can confirm you that
> tuning/removing coalesce parameters this helped. The tuning I decided
> to keep in the driver was suitable in several user cases and if now
> you have problems or you want to review it I can just confirm that
> there are no problems on my side. If you want to simply the logic
> around the tx process and remove timer on official driver I can accept
> that. I will just ask you uto double check if the throughput and
> CPU usage when request max throughput (better if on GiGa setup) has
> no regressions.
> Otherwise we could start thinking about adaptive schema if feasible.

Ok, so you see the issue. Good.

See the other email to description how it could be fixed... the logic
is broken. How it was not discovered for 4 years is mystery to me.
 
> >Agreed that no irqlock protection is needed if we rely on napi and timers.
> 
> ok

Actually I was wrong there. Another reason to disable tx coalescing
until it is fixed.

Best regards,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)