[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a2cf9a6-ad80-0c50-3897-6e48fbb9073c@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 14:20:57 +0200
From: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: Andy Gross <andy.gross@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/9] media: venus: hfi: add Venus HFI files
Hi Hans,
On 12/05/2016 02:05 PM, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> On 12/01/2016 10:03 AM, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
>> Here is the implementation of Venus video accelerator low-level
>> functionality. It contanins code which setup the registers and
>> startup uthe processor, allocate and manipulates with the shared
>> memory used for sending commands and receiving messages.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.c | 1508 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.h | 23 +
>> drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus_io.h | 98 ++
>> 3 files changed, 1629 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.c
>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.h
>> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus_io.h
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.c b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..f004a9a80d85
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/qcom/venus/hfi_venus.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,1508 @@
>> +static int venus_tzbsp_set_video_state(enum tzbsp_video_state state)
>> +{
>> + return qcom_scm_video_set_state(state, 0);
>
> This functions doesn't seem to exist. Is there a prerequisite patch series that
> introduces this function?
yes, the patchset [1] is under review.
--
regards,
Stan
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/11/7/533
Powered by blists - more mailing lists