linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Device links documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161205150203.GA7653@wunner.de>
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2016 16:02:03 +0100
From:   Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Device links documentation

On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:08:16AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> [crazy CC list dropped]
> 
> Can someone explain who the hell I ended up the on this stupid
> Cc long list for a reply to a mail I can't see either in my
> inbox or lkml folder?

You were cc'ed on this series but the messages bounced:

<hch@...radead.org>: host casper.infradead.org[85.118.1.10] said: 550 Invalid
    address in message header. Consult RFC2822. (in reply to end of DATA
    command)

LKML was cc'ed as well but I can't see the series in the web archives,
perhaps it was filtered due to the length of the Cc: header.

Indeed the cc list was lengthy, whether crazily or stupidly so I don't
know.  I cc'ed everyone that was pulled into the device links discussion
in November to allow them to comment on the documentation.  You were
pulled in by Luis in this e-mail:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2380422.html

Best regards,

Lukas