[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161205031639.GB2667@dragon>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 11:16:41 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
Cc: jun.nie@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
xie.baoyou@....com.cn, chen.chaokai@....com.cn,
wang.qiang01@....com.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: zx: add pcu_domain node for zx296718
On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 07:59:14PM +0800, Baoyou Xie wrote:
> This patch adds the pcu_domain node, so it can be used
> by zte-soc's power domain driver.
>
> Furthermore, it adds the document of the node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@...aro.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/zte.txt | 11 +++++++++++
DT bindings doc should be a separate patch, and goes together with
driver changes using the bindings through subsystem maintainers, rather
than dts patches.
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/zte/zx296718.dtsi | 7 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/zte.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/zte.txt
> index 83369785..19a7e1b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/zte.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/zte.txt
> @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ System management required properties:
> - compatible = "zte,zx296718-aon-sysctrl"
> - compatible = "zte,zx296718-sysctrl"
>
> +Low power management required properties:
> + - compatible = "zte,zx296718-pcu"
> +
> Example:
> aon_sysctrl: aon-sysctrl@...000 {
> compatible = "zte,zx296718-aon-sysctrl", "syscon";
> @@ -37,3 +40,11 @@ sysctrl: sysctrl@...3000 {
> compatible = "zte,zx296718-sysctrl", "syscon";
> reg = <0x1463000 0x1000>;
> };
> +
> +pcu_domain: pcu@...0117000 {
> + compatible = "zte,zx296718-pcu";
> + reg = <0x00117000 0x1000>;
> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> + status = "ok";
> +};
> +
I think we should have a separate bindings doc for PCU power domain
block in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/zte.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/zte/zx296718.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/zte/zx296718.dtsi
> index b44d1d1..39e70c7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/zte/zx296718.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/zte/zx296718.dtsi
> @@ -351,5 +351,12 @@
> reg = <0x01480000 0x1000>;
> #clock-cells = <1>;
> };
> +
> + pcu_domain: pcu@...0117000 {
Please drop the 0x and leading zeros in unit-address after node name.
That said, the node name should be written like below:
pcu@...000 {
Also, please sort the node with unit-address in order of the address.
That means that pcu node should be put after aon-sysctrl@...000.
> + compatible = "zte,zx296718-pcu";
> + reg = <0x00117000 0x1000>;
> + #power-domain-cells = <1>;
> + status = "ok";
The property 'status' is generally used to enable devices that have
board-level pin-out or configuration in board dts. It's not really
necessary for pcu here.
Shawn
> + };
> };
> };
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists