[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F4CC6FACFEB3C54C9141D49AD221F7F91A7DDD3F@lhreml503-mbx>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 15:42:35 +0000
From: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: "Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen)" <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
"mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com" <mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 net-next] net: hns: Fix to conditionally convey RX
checksum flag to stack
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2016 8:25 PM
> To: Salil Mehta
> Cc: Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen); mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Linuxarm
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next] net: hns: Fix to conditionally convey
> RX checksum flag to stack
>
> From: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:59:14 +0000
>
> > It looks to me the cumbersome check in the PATCH V2 should
> > be retained.
>
> I really want something simpler with small checks that are
> done in logical pieces in a straigtforward progression.
>
> The code in V2 is completely unreadable.
Hi David,
I understand your concern. I have floated the Patch V3 with
re-structured code for your review. Thanks!
Best regards
Salil
Powered by blists - more mailing lists