lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2016 15:42:35 +0000
From:   Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     "Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen)" <yisen.zhuang@...wei.com>,
        "mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com" <mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 net-next] net: hns: Fix to conditionally convey RX
 checksum flag to stack

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Miller [mailto:davem@...emloft.net]
> Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2016 8:25 PM
> To: Salil Mehta
> Cc: Zhuangyuzeng (Yisen); mehta.salil.lnk@...il.com;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Linuxarm
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 net-next] net: hns: Fix to conditionally convey
> RX checksum flag to stack
> 
> From: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>
> Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2016 16:59:14 +0000
> 
> > It looks to me the cumbersome check in the PATCH V2 should
> > be retained.
> 
> I really want something simpler with small checks that are
> done in logical pieces in a straigtforward progression.
> 
> The code in V2 is completely unreadable.
Hi David,
I understand your concern. I have floated the Patch V3 with
re-structured code for your review. Thanks!

Best regards
Salil


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ