[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161205210439.GA6038@eichest-notebook>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 22:04:39 +0100
From: Stefan Eichenberger <eichest@...il.com>
To: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...oirfairelinux.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next v2 4/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add PPU
operations
Hi Vivien,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 11:27:03AM -0500, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> @@ -3266,6 +3220,8 @@ static const struct mv88e6xxx_ops mv88e6097_ops = {
> .g1_set_cpu_port = mv88e6095_g1_set_cpu_port,
> .g1_set_egress_port = mv88e6095_g1_set_egress_port,
> .mgmt_rsvd2cpu = mv88e6095_g2_mgmt_rsvd2cpu,
> + .ppu_enable = mv88e6185_g1_ppu_enable,
> + .ppu_disable = mv88e6185_g1_ppu_disable,
> .reset = mv88e6185_g1_reset,
> };
The mv88e6097 should use the indirect access to the phys, bit 14 in g1
control is marked as reserved. They write in the datasheet that
disabling the PPU is still supported but indirect access via g2 should
be used because disabling the PPU is no longer recommended.
Best regards,
Stefan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists