linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Update Documentation/00-INDEX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161205142301.58f5a129@lwn.net>
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2016 14:23:01 -0700
From:   Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com>
Cc:     Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Update Documentation/00-INDEX

On Mon,  5 Dec 2016 09:41:40 -0200
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...pensource.com> wrote:

> So, in order to check it, I wrote a small script that compares the files
> and directories at Documentation/ with the ones at 00-INDEX.
> 
> Then, I synchronized the entries, making the script happy.
> 
> We might think on integrating the script with checkpatch.pl, but, as
> we should get rid of 00-INDEX, it probably not worth the efforts.

I would agree with that; I don't see the point of keeping those files
around in the longer term.

I've applied the set.  I do have a few quibbles with the final patch that
I'll send separately, but they're not something to hold this set up for.

Thanks,

jon