linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/10] perf sched timehist: Cleanup idle_max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e76abd58-a943-8f00-e55b-fdda802f649a@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 5 Dec 2016 20:00:26 -0800
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] perf sched timehist: Cleanup idle_max_cpu handling

On 12/5/16 7:40 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> It treats the idle_max_cpu little bit confusingly IMHO.  Let's make it
> more straight forward.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-sched.c | 9 ++++-----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 

Seems correct. I've lost track of how idle_max_cpu ended up like that.

Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>