[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161206111615.GB7730@krava>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 12:16:15 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: kan.liang@...el.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, namhyung@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, wangnan0@...wei.com, mark.rutland@....com,
andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 08/13] perf tools: show kernel overhead
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 04:19:16PM -0500, kan.liang@...el.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
>
> The kernel overhead include sample overhead, multiplexing overhead and
> side-band events overhead. All the information is printed in the head of
> output file if the show profiling cost option is applied.
> The result is sorted by CPU. If there is no available CPU information in
> sample, using -1 instead.
>
> Output when CPU is available
> # To display the perf.data header info, please use
> --header/--header-only options.
> #
> # ========
> # CPU SAM SAM cost(ns) MUX MUX cost(ns) SB
> SB cost(ns)
> # 0 2261446 1991216491 122174 1128716680 0
- please make this output properly alligned
- it'd be nice to see some 1000 delimitiers
- do we need to display the rest of the perf output,
it seems too much to me already
thanks,
jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists