linux-kernel - Re: Tearing down DMA transfer setup after DMA client has finished

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5846B237.8060409@free.fr>
Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2016 13:42:31 +0100
From:   Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>
To:     Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>, Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>,
        Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:     dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>,
        Thibaud Cornic <thibaud_cornic@...madesigns.com>
Subject: Re: Tearing down DMA transfer setup after DMA client has finished

On 06/12/2016 06:12, Vinod Koul wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 07:25:02PM +0100, Mason wrote:
> 
>> Is there a way to write a driver within the existing framework?
> 
> I think so, looking back at comments from Russell, I do tend to agree with
> that. Is there a specific reason why sbox can't be tied to alloc and free
> channels?

Here's a recap of the situation.

The "SBOX+MBUS" HW is used in several iterations of the tango SoC:

tango3
  2 memory channels available
  6 devices ("clients"?) may request an MBUS channel

tango4 (one more channel)
  3 memory channels available
  7 devices may request an MBUS channel :
    NFC0, NFC1, SATA0, SATA1, memcpy, (IDE0, IDE1)

Notes:
The current NFC driver supports only one controller.
IDE is mostly obsolete at this point.

tango5 (SATA gets own dedicated MBUS channel pair)
  3 memory channels available
  5 devices may request an MBUS channel :
    NFC0, NFC1, memcpy, (IDE0, IDE1)


If I understand the current DMA driver (written by Mans), client
drivers are instructed to use a specific channel in the DT, and
the DMA driver muxes access to that channel. The DMA driver
manages a per-channel queue of outstanding DMA transfer requests,
and a new transfer is started friom within the DMA ISR
(modulo the fact that the interrupt does not signal completion
of the transfer, as explained else-thread).

What you're proposing, Vinod, is to make a channel exclusive
to a driver, as long as the driver has not explicitly released
the channel, via dma_release_channel(), right?

Regards.