[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1481038106-24899-4-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 17:40:42 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH 03/10] drm/virtio: fix lock context imbalance
When virtio_gpu_free_vbufs exits due to list empty, it does not
drop the free_vbufs lock that it took.
list empty is not expected to happen anyway, but it can't hurt to fix
this and drop the lock.
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
index 5a0f8a7..2f0c2f9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_vq.c
@@ -109,8 +109,10 @@ void virtio_gpu_free_vbufs(struct virtio_gpu_device *vgdev)
spin_lock(&vgdev->free_vbufs_lock);
for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
- if (WARN_ON(list_empty(&vgdev->free_vbufs)))
+ if (WARN_ON(list_empty(&vgdev->free_vbufs))) {
+ spin_unlock(&vgdev->free_vbufs_lock);
return;
+ }
vbuf = list_first_entry(&vgdev->free_vbufs,
struct virtio_gpu_vbuffer, list);
list_del(&vbuf->list);
--
MST
Powered by blists - more mailing lists