[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2b80e62b-5a1a-d2d0-eeb0-ad1d7ed0f44b@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 17:28:08 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>, eric.auger.pro@...il.com,
christoffer.dall@...aro.org, marc.zyngier@....com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, will.deacon@....com, joro@...tes.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, jason@...edaemon.net,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, drjones@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pranav.sawargaonkar@...il.com,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, punit.agrawal@....com,
diana.craciun@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 03/10] iommu: Add new reserved IOMMU attributes
On 15/11/16 13:09, Eric Auger wrote:
> IOMMU_RESV_NOMAP is used to tag reserved IOVAs that are not
> supposed to be IOMMU mapped. IOMMU_RESV_MSI tags IOVAs
> corresponding to MSIs that need to be IOMMU mapped.
>
> IOMMU_RESV_MASK allows to check if the IOVA is reserved.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/iommu.h | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h
> index 7f6ebd0..02cf565 100644
> --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> @@ -32,6 +32,10 @@
> #define IOMMU_NOEXEC (1 << 3)
> #define IOMMU_MMIO (1 << 4) /* e.g. things like MSI doorbells */
>
> +#define IOMMU_RESV_MASK 0x300 /* Reserved IOVA mask */
> +#define IOMMU_RESV_NOMAP (1 << 8) /* IOVA that cannot be mapped */
> +#define IOMMU_RESV_MSI (1 << 9) /* MSI region transparently mapped */
It feels a bit grotty encoding these in prot - NOMAP sort of fits, but
MSI really is something else entirely. On reflection I think a separate
iommu_resv_region::type field would be better, particularly as it's
something we might potentially want to expose via the sysfs entry.
Robin.
> +
> struct iommu_ops;
> struct iommu_group;
> struct bus_type;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists