[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20161206180427.ophic3u64casl7n7@pd.tnic>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 19:04:27 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Matthew Whitehead <tedheadster@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] x86/fpu: Fix "x86/fpu: Legacy x87 FPU detected"
message
On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 09:59:56AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> I did something like this for FSAVE vs FXSAVE. XSAVE has its own pile
> of printouts and I don't feel like I need to add another.
So frankly, replacing "legacy" with "pre-XSAVE" is not making it any
clearer - it is just calling it differently. IMO.
Dumping those three makes it exact.
But I don't care too much about it - it is in /proc/cpuinfo anyway.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists