linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 00/23] arm: defconfigs: use kconfig fragments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2016 11:03:34 -0800
From:   Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:     Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc:     "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/23] arm: defconfigs: use kconfig fragments

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 4:38 AM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<b.zolnierkie@...sung.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This RFC patchset starts convertion of ARM defconfigs to use kconfig
> fragments and dynamically generate defconfigs.  The goals of this
> work are to:

You don't provide any motivation as to why this is better. As far as I
am concerned it'll just be a mess.

So:

Nack. So much nack. I really don't want to see a proliferation of
config fragments like this.

I had a feeling it was a bad idea to pick up that one line config
fragment before, since it opened the door for this kind of mess. :(

-Olof