linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] PCI/ACPI: xgene: Add ECAM quirk for X-Gene PCIe controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0a96dada-59de-157f-cbfd-daca229a736a@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 6 Dec 2016 15:23:34 -0500
From:   Jon Masters <jcm@...hat.com>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     Duc Dang <dhdang@....com>, Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>, patches <patches@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] PCI/ACPI: xgene: Add ECAM quirk for X-Gene PCIe
 controller

On 12/06/2016 03:18 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 02:46:00PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
>> On 12/05/2016 04:21 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 07:33:46PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
>>
>>>>> Even without this patch, I don't think it's a show-stopper to have
>>>>> Linux mistakenly thinking this region is routed to PCI, because the
>>>>> driver does reserve it and the PCI core will never try to use it.
>>>>
>>>> Ok. So are you happy with pulling in Duc's v4 patch and retaining
>>>> status quo on the bridge resources for 4.10?
>>>
>>> Yes, I think it looks good.  I'll finish packaging things up and
>>> repost the current series.
>>
>> Ok, great. So you're still pretty confident we'll have "out of the box"
>> booting on these machines for 4.10? :)
> 
> I just merged pci/ecam into my "next" branch, so as long as tomorrow's
> linux-next boots out of the box, we should be set.  I made the following
> changes compared to v11:
> 
>   - dropped the x86 change to use acpi_resource_consumer()
>   - added parens around macro args used in arithmetic expressions
>   - renamed "seg" to "node" in THUNDER_PEM_RES and THUNDER_PEM_QUIRK
>   - incorporated (u64) cast and dropped "UL" postfix for THUNDER_PEM_QUIRK
> 
> Let me know if you see any issues.

Thanks - I'll test linux-next tomorrow.

Jon.

-- 
Computer Architect | Sent from my Fedora powered laptop