[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b74a021-e472-a21e-7936-6741e07906b5@suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 09:48:52 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@...s.chinamobile.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yisheng Xie <xieyisheng1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3] mm: use READ_ONCE in page_cpupid_xchg_last()
On 12/07/2016 09:43 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 06-12-16 09:53:14, Xishi Qiu wrote:
>> A compiler could re-read "old_flags" from the memory location after reading
>> and calculation "flags" and passes a newer value into the cmpxchg making
>> the comparison succeed while it should actually fail.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
>> Suggested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
>> ---
>> mm/mmzone.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/mmzone.c b/mm/mmzone.c
>> index 5652be8..e0b698e 100644
>> --- a/mm/mmzone.c
>> +++ b/mm/mmzone.c
>> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ int page_cpupid_xchg_last(struct page *page, int cpupid)
>> int last_cpupid;
>>
>> do {
>> - old_flags = flags = page->flags;
>> + old_flags = flags = READ_ONCE(page->flags);
>> last_cpupid = page_cpupid_last(page);
>
> what prevents compiler from doing?
> old_flags = READ_ONCE(page->flags);
> flags = READ_ONCE(page->flags);
AFAIK, READ_ONCE tells the compiler that page->flags is volatile. It
can't read from volatile location more times than being told?
> Or this doesn't matter?
I think it would matter.
>>
>> flags &= ~(LAST_CPUPID_MASK << LAST_CPUPID_PGSHIFT);
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists