linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv13 2/3] usb: USB Type-C connector class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20161207091147.GA11966@kuha.fi.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 7 Dec 2016 11:11:47 +0200
From:   Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv13 2/3] usb: USB Type-C connector class

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 10:04:39AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> At least for my part I very much concentrated on making sure that
> the user space ABI as well as the port driver API are sane and usable.
> 
> The driver interface is not my area of expertise. As such, my testing
> and understanding of that part was limited to "it appears to work,
> it must be ok". I very much relied on you to get this part right.
> 
> That makes me feel really bad. It isn't fun to have my "Reviewed-by"
> on a patch that gets (and apparently deserves) a WTF from a senior
> kernel maintainer. This hurts both your and my reputation, and obviously
> will make me quite hesitant to add a "Reviewed-by:" to the next version
> of the series.

I don't usually get very upset about stronger comments, even if they
are coming from senior kernel maintainer like Greg, but your concern
does make me feel like crap. I'm sorry Guenter.

Please just note that nobody else has considered the approach as a
problem or noticed it before Greg any more then you, and this code has
by now been review by many, including some people who I consider senior
kernel developers and maintainers, both internally inside Intel and
also publicly on these lists.

> No more shortcuts, please.

No.


Br,

-- 
heikki