[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+M3ks4VbV6z6t7aORKGmduZfFF+Ls7Sq8umWRFyo3sn8WZt7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 12:00:21 +0100
From: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
alexandre.torgue@...com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
knaack.h@....de, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>,
Gerald Baeza <gerald.baeza@...com>,
Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Linaro Kernel Mailman List <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] IIO: add STM32 timer trigger driver
2016-12-07 11:50 GMT+01:00 Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>:
> On Tue, 06 Dec 2016, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>
>> [snip]
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const triggers0[] = {
>> >> + TIM1_TRGO, TIM1_CH1, TIM1_CH2, TIM1_CH3, TIM1_CH4, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const triggers1[] = {
>> >> + TIM2_TRGO, TIM2_CH1, TIM2_CH2, TIM2_CH3, TIM2_CH4, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const triggers2[] = {
>> >> + TIM3_TRGO, TIM3_CH1, TIM3_CH2, TIM3_CH3, TIM3_CH4, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const triggers3[] = {
>> >> + TIM4_TRGO, TIM4_CH1, TIM4_CH2, TIM4_CH3, TIM4_CH4, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const triggers4[] = {
>> >> + TIM5_TRGO, TIM5_CH1, TIM5_CH2, TIM5_CH3, TIM5_CH4, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const triggers5[] = {
>> >> + TIM6_TRGO, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const triggers6[] = {
>> >> + TIM7_TRGO, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const triggers7[] = {
>> >> + TIM8_TRGO, TIM8_CH1, TIM8_CH2, TIM8_CH3, TIM8_CH4, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const triggers8[] = {
>> >> + TIM9_TRGO, TIM9_CH1, TIM9_CH2, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const triggers9[] = {
>> >> + TIM12_TRGO, TIM12_CH1, TIM12_CH2, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const void *triggers_table[] = {
>> >> + triggers0,
>> >> + triggers1,
>> >> + triggers2,
>> >> + triggers3,
>> >> + triggers4,
>> >> + triggers5,
>> >> + triggers6,
>> >> + triggers7,
>> >> + triggers8,
>> >> + triggers9,
>> >> +};
>> >
>> > What about:
>> >
>> > static const char * const triggers[][] = {
>> > { TIM1_TRGO, TIM1_CH1, TIM1_CH2, TIM1_CH3, TIM1_CH4, NULL },
>> > { TIM2_TRGO, TIM2_CH1, TIM2_CH2, TIM2_CH3, TIM2_CH4, NULL },
>> > { TIM3_TRGO, TIM3_CH1, TIM3_CH2, TIM3_CH3, TIM3_CH4, NULL },
>> > { TIM4_TRGO, TIM4_CH1, TIM4_CH2, TIM4_CH3, TIM4_CH4, NULL },
>> > { TIM5_TRGO, TIM5_CH1, TIM5_CH2, TIM5_CH3, TIM5_CH4, NULL },
>> > { TIM6_TRGO, NULL },
>> > { TIM7_TRGO, NULL },
>> > { TIM8_TRGO, TIM8_CH1, TIM8_CH2, TIM8_CH3, TIM8_CH4, NULL },
>> > { TIM9_TRGO, TIM9_CH1, TIM9_CH2, NULL },
>> > { TIM12_TRGO, TIM12_CH1, TIM12_CH2, NULL }
>> > };
>>
>> I can't because the second dimension of the array isn't fix.
>> I could have between 2 and 6 elements per row... to create a dual dimension
>> array I would have to add NULL entries like that:
>>
>> #define MAX_TRIGGERS 6
>>
>> static const void *triggers_table[][MAX_TRIGGERS] = {
>> { TIM1_TRGO, TIM1_CH1, TIM1_CH2, TIM1_CH3, TIM1_CH4, NULL,},
>> { TIM2_TRGO, TIM2_CH1, TIM2_CH2, TIM2_CH3, TIM2_CH4, NULL,},
>> { TIM3_TRGO, TIM3_CH1, TIM3_CH2, TIM3_CH3, TIM3_CH4, NULL,},
>> { TIM4_TRGO, TIM4_CH1, TIM4_CH2, TIM4_CH3, TIM4_CH4, NULL,},
>> { TIM5_TRGO, TIM5_CH1, TIM5_CH2, TIM5_CH3, TIM5_CH4, NULL,},
>> { TIM6_TRGO, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,},
>> { TIM7_TRGO, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL,},
>> { TIM8_TRGO, TIM8_CH1, TIM8_CH2, TIM8_CH3, TIM8_CH4, NULL,},
>> { TIM9_TRGO, TIM9_CH1, TIM9_CH2, NULL, NULL, NULL,},
>> { TIM12_TRGO, TIM12_CH1, TIM12_CH2, NULL, NULL, NULL,},
>> };
>
> It was just an idea, not a tested implementation.
>
> I don't understand why you have to pad with NULLs, but either way, it
> looks much better than before and saves lots of lines of code.
I have tested it this morning and it works fine so I will include it in v5.
I use NULL as limit when iterate in the table and for table padding too.
>
>> >> +static const char * const valids0[] = {
>> >> + TIM5_TRGO, TIM2_TRGO, TIM4_TRGO, TIM3_TRGO, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const valids1[] = {
>> >> + TIM1_TRGO, TIM8_TRGO, TIM3_TRGO, TIM4_TRGO, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const valids2[] = {
>> >> + TIM1_TRGO, TIM8_TRGO, TIM5_TRGO, TIM4_TRGO, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const valids3[] = {
>> >> + TIM1_TRGO, TIM2_TRGO, TIM3_TRGO, TIM8_TRGO, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char *const valids4[] = {
>> >> + TIM2_TRGO, TIM3_TRGO, TIM4_TRGO, TIM8_TRGO, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const valids7[] = {
>> >> + TIM1_TRGO, TIM2_TRGO, TIM4_TRGO, TIM5_TRGO, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const valids8[] = {
>> >> + TIM2_TRGO, TIM3_TRGO, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const char * const valids9[] = {
>> >> + TIM4_TRGO, TIM5_TRGO, NULL,
>> >> +};
>> >> +
>> >> +static const void *valids_table[] = {
>> >> + valids0,
>> >> + valids1,
>> >> + valids2,
>> >> + valids3,
>> >> + valids4,
>> >> + NULL,
>> >> + NULL,
>> >> + valids7,
>> >> + valids8,
>> >> + valids9,
>> >> +};
>> >
>> > Same here.
>> >
>
> --
> Lee Jones
> Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
> Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists