linux-kernel - Re: LSF/MM 2017: Call for Proposals

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1481122626.2354.14.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date:   Wed, 07 Dec 2016 06:57:06 -0800
From:   James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, "xfs@....sgi.com" <xfs@....sgi.com>,
        ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     "lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org" 
        <lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: LSF/MM 2017: Call for Proposals

On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 09:11 -0500, Jeff Layton wrote:
> 1) Proposals for agenda topics should be sent before January 15th, 
> 2016 to:
> 
>     lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> 
> and cc the Linux list or lists that are relevant for the topic in
> question:
> 
>     ATA:   linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
>     Block: linux-block@...r.kernel.org
>     FS:    linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
>     MM:    linux-mm@...ck.org
>     SCSI:  linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
>     NVMe:  linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org
> 
> Please tag your proposal with [LSF/MM TOPIC] to make it easier to 
> track.

Just on this point, since there seems to be a lot of confusion: lsf-pc
is the list for contacting the programme committee, so you cannot
subscribe to it.

There is no -discuss equivalent, like kernel summit has, because we
expect you to cc the relevant existing mailing list and have the
discussion there instead rather than expecting people to subscribe to a
new list.

James